subject

Your friends have written a very fast piece of maximum-flow code based on repeatedly finding augmenting paths as in Section 7.1. However, after you’ve looked at a bit of output from it, you realize that it’s not always finding a flow of maximum value. The bug turns out to be pretty easy to find; your friends hadn’t really gotten into the whole backward-edge thing when writing the code, and so their implementation builds a variant of the residual graph that only includes the forward edges. In other words, it searches for s-t paths in a graph Gf consisting only of edges e for which f(e) < ce, and it terminates when there is no augmenting path consisting entirely of such edges. We’ll call this the Forward-Edge-Only Algorithm. (Note that we do not try to prescribe how this algorithm chooses its forward-edge paths; it may choose them in any fashion it wants, provided that it terminates only when there are no forward-edge paths.) It’s hard to convince your friends they need to reimplement the code. In addition to its blazing speed, they claim, in fact, that it never returns a flow whose value is less than a fixed fraction of optimal. Do you believe this? The crux of their claim can be made precise in the following statement.
There is an absolute constant b > 1 (independent of the particular input flow network), so that on every instance of the Maximum-Flow Problem, the Forward-Edge-Only Algorithm is guaranteed to find a flow of value at least 1/b times the maximum-flow value (regardless of how it chooses its forward-edge paths).
Decide whether you think this statement is true or false, and give a proof of either the statement or its negation.
Be sure to include:
an explanation of what the maximum flow in your graph is;
a sequence of paths that, if chosen by Ford-Fulkerson, leads to non-optimal flow;
an explanation of why there are no more paths of positive residual capacity after that sequence of paths when you omit backward edges from the residual graph; and
an explanation of how to generalize the above so that you end up with an arbitrarily small ratio of found flow to maximum flow.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Computers and Technology

question
Computers and Technology, 22.06.2019 04:30
There is a simple pattern for determining if a binary number is odd. what is it and why does this pattern occur? how many bits would you need if you wanted to have the ability to count up to 1000? how high could you count in binary if you used all 10 of your fingers as bits? (finger up means 1, finger down means 0)
Answers: 3
question
Computers and Technology, 23.06.2019 02:50
There’s only one game mode that stars with the letter ‘e’ in cs: go. which of the options below is it?
Answers: 1
question
Computers and Technology, 24.06.2019 00:30
The best definition of an idiom is a. a word or phrase that describes a noun b. a word or phrase describing a verb c. a phrase containing figurative language in which the word expresses a different idea from its exact meaning d. a phrase that compares two unlike objects or ideas
Answers: 2
question
Computers and Technology, 25.06.2019 03:30
Kou converged his word document to a powerpoint document. when he received the powerpoint, he was missing material. which most likely explains why the material was missing? a it did not have a proper heading b he incorrectly copied and pasted it c he did not save his document properly d there was not enough space in powerpoint
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Your friends have written a very fast piece of maximum-flow code based on repeatedly finding augment...
Questions
Questions on the website: 13722367