Regarding the role played by the “victim” in deadlock resolution, give an example of such a deadlock in real life and explain your answers to these questions. a. Describe how you might choose the victim to be removed and the consequences, both positive and negative, of that removal.

b. Describe the fate of the victim and the chances of eventually completing its processing.

c. Describe the actions required, if any, to complete the victim’s tasks. ​

Here the answer is given as follows,

Explanation:  

The real-life situation of a deadlock resolution where a role is played by the victim is given as follows:  

Example: An example of such a situation are often a one-way lane where the flow of traffic is merely in a method. Thus, on just one occasion, the flow of traffic can enter one direction only. Each entrance/exit gate is often considered a resource. during this case, if two cars are coming from both the entrances and that they are often considered as two tasks, then one among the cars must copy or we will say hand over its resource in order that the opposite car gets the prospect to first cross the lane or we will say the opposite task gets executed.  

 a)  Victim: The steps which describe how a victim is chosen are given as follows :  

   The task which is terminated so as to interrupt things of deadlock is taken into account because of the victim.

There are often a variety of job pools that will be under a deadlock situation and therefore the victim is usually a low-priority task in order that the performance isn't affected that much and termination of this task doesn't cause any effect on the opposite jobs.

the main positive effect of selecting and terminating a victim is that things of deadlock are resolved and every one of the tasks can execute now.

The negative effect is that the task that's chosen because the victim is terminated and is executed at the previous. This whole process for choosing a victim then terminating it then restarting it again may consume some longer also.

b)  An easy deadlock priority is often set. this suggests that the victim’s task or the task is often terminated so as to interrupt the deadlock and other jobs can finish executing. After this, the task which is terminated are often later restarted and every one of the tasks can then execute without a deadlock.

 c) When employment gets terminated, the knowledge associated with it's stored. Are often This is often done in order that the work can be restarted again and therefore the information in it's not lost. Since the progress of the victim is stopped. Thus, the sole thanks to complete the victim’s task would be to start out it again. But before restarting the task, this must be considered that the victim’s task doesn't cause any deadlock within the system.  

i belive the answer you are looking for is d: the nether

no. when the asker posts the question they can make a question worth what ever they think is a fair price. although it must be within the limit of the points they currently own. 5 is the minimum number of points a question can be worth. if a question is complicated or has lots of parts to it, it is better to make it worth more because more people will be more willing to answer.

hope this !