When law enforcement becomes involved, the need may arise to freeze systems as part of the evidence. There is also the likelihood that the incident will become known publicly. Do you think these issues play a significant part in the decision to involve law enforcement? Why or why not? Can you name some situations in which you believe that large organizations have decided not to involve law enforcement?

Costs will cover a need for more customer data. The further explanation is given below.

Explanation:

It's the greatest problem for almost every company to provide the data with security. This is possible for highly trained practitioners and the technical staff to take charge of it. Complicated technologies would have been going to run together again to withstand these types of jobs.Such problems play a major part in the decision-making process affecting the law enforcement authorities to locate the suspects to strengthen the organization.To do something like this, there seem to be a lot of other good initiatives out there doing it.

There have been some cases in which major corporations have chosen not to include law enforcement:

There are many more electronic corruption going on, including money robbery, asset fraud, as well as machine assaults. In such a bigger case, numerous institutions, such as large-scale ones, have gone through these circumstances to evaluate law enforcement to come to terms with cybersecurity.

The answer is phishing : )