Consider a computer with two processes, H, with high priority, and L, with low priority. The scheduling rules are such that H is run whenever it is in ready state. At a certain moment, with L in its critical region, H becomes ready to run (e. g., an I/O operation completes). H now begins busy waiting, but since L is never scheduled with H is running, L never gets the chance to leave its critical region, so H loops forever. This situation is sometimes referred to as the priority inversion problem. If instead of priority scheduling, we use round-robin scheduling, will we encounter the same problem?

The cm is responsible for overseeing the actions of the crisis management team and coordinating all crisis management efforts in cooperation with disaster recovery and/or business continuity planning, on an as-needed basis

Suppose we have a byte addressable computer that has a 32-byte cache with 8 bytes per block. the memory address is 8 bits long. the system accesses memory addresses (in hex) in this exact order: 6e, b9, 17, e0, 4e, 4f, 50, 91, a8, ab, ad, 93, and 94. (a) assuming the cache is direct mapped, what memory addresses will be in cache block 2 after the last address has been accessed? (b) assuming the cache is direct mapped, what is the hit ratio for the entire memory reference sequence given, assuming the cache is initially empty? (c) assuming the cache is 2-way set associative with a lru replacement policy, what is the hit ratio?

Which of the following commands is more recommended while creating a bot?