subject
Chemistry, 27.07.2019 01:00 anenee1

So, it is seen that the destruction of ozone can be catalyzed by no or by cl. it has been found that the activation energy for the reaction catalyzed by cl is 2 kj/mol and for the reaction catalyzed by no is 12 kj/mol. which is the more effective catalyst? why?

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Chemistry

question
Chemistry, 21.06.2019 22:30
Which statement best describes the oxidation numbers of the atoms found in magnesium chloride? a. magnesium has a 2- oxidation number and chlorine has a 1+ oxidation number. b. magnesium has a 2- oxidation number and chlorine has a 2+ oxidation number. c. magnesium has a 2+ oxidation number and chlorine has a 1- oxidation number. d. magnesium has a 1+ oxidation number and chlorine has a 1- oxidation number.
Answers: 2
question
Chemistry, 22.06.2019 04:30
The big bang nucleosynthesis theory states that elements were produced in the first few minutes of the big bang while elements have their origins in the interiors of stars, forming much later in the history of the universe.
Answers: 1
question
Chemistry, 22.06.2019 06:30
Suppose a lab group reports a ppercent yield of sand of 105. is it really possible to collect more sand than was originally represented? what is the possible explanation for the extra product?
Answers: 2
question
Chemistry, 22.06.2019 12:40
Consider the directing effects of the substituents on salicylamide and predict the possible structures of the iodination products. which do you think will be the major product?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
So, it is seen that the destruction of ozone can be catalyzed by no or by cl. it has been found that...
Questions
question
Health, 22.04.2021 21:40
question
Mathematics, 22.04.2021 21:40
question
Mathematics, 22.04.2021 21:40
question
Mathematics, 22.04.2021 21:40
question
History, 22.04.2021 21:40
Questions on the website: 13722363