Which is a correct comparison between the modern quantum model and John Dalton’s model of the atom?

No comparison => John Dalton did NOT postulate an atomic structure.

Explanation:

Dalton's postulates are based upon generalizations of observable phenomena. Micro structure was not proposed.  The atomic structure that's accepted in the scientific community evolved from conclusions of ...

Thompson's raisen pudding model => electrons suspended in a positive matrix

Rutherford's shell model => dense positive nucleus surrounded by an electron cloud. (No fine structure postulated)

Bohr Concentric Ring Model => electrons orbiting a positive nucleus in discrete  energy levels much like planets orbiting the sun.

Schrodinger - Dirac Quantum Models => electrons occupying specific orbital energy levels as based upon statistical wave mechanics.

shield volcanos are angry and get mad over the smallest things so much that there heads erupt   pahoehoe and a'a lava. a composite volcano is the poller opposite of a shield volcano. its   peaceful thing and knows how to control its emotions.      

as given the equation is

2al + 6 hcl > 2 alcl3 + 3 h2(g)

as per equation two moles of aluminum reacts with six moles of hcl to give two moles of alcl3 and three moles of hydrogen gas

given: three moles of al are present and 7 moles of hcl

for three moles of aluminum nine moles of hcl will be required

however as 7 moles of hcl are present so the limiting reagent is hcl

hcl is going to decide the number of moles of product formed

when six moles of hcl are present = 3 moles of h2 are formed

when one mole of hcl is present == 3/6 mole sof h2 will be formed

when 7 moles of hcl are present = 3 x 7/ 6 moles of h2 will be formed = 3.5 moles of h2