During an experiment, Juan rolled a six-sided number cube 18 times. The number two occurred four times. Juan claimed the experimental probability of rolling a two was approximately 1/9. Which of the following is true about Juan’s claim? A. Juan’s claim is incorrect. The correct experimental probability is 2/9.
B. Juan’s claim is incorrect. The correct experimental probability is 1/3.
C. Juan’s claim is incorrect. The correct experimental probability is 4/9.
D. Juan’s claim is correct.
PLEASE HURRY
God bless, stay safe, and happy holidays! :)

Because u would have to find the undercorse of 010-1 witch makes the out of part by 6

Explanation:

Given :

Juan rolled a six-sided number cube 18 times.

The number two occurred four times.

To Find: Juan claimed the experimental probability of rolling a two was approximately 1/9. Why is Juan’s experimental probability incorrect?

Solution:

Total events = number of times cube rolled = 18

Favorable events = The number two occurred four times.  = 4

So, Experimental probability of rolling a two was approximately 1/9

distance, luminosity, brightness, radius, chemical composition, and temperature

the number of protons in the nucleus of a given element. has slight luster and conducts electricity at high temperatures like metal.but like a nonmetal,boron is brittle and does not conduct electricity well at low temperatures. in graphite, carbon is a soft,brittle solid.it is reflective,ductile,or malleable.