You used 1.512 g of your unknown weak acid and it took 37.98 mL of your standardized 0.107 M NaOH to reach the 2nd equivalence point, using the procedure described in the lab manual. What is the molecular weight of the acid

Explanation:

37.98 mL of .107 M NaOH = 37.98 x .107 mL of M NaOH

= 4.064 mL  of M NaOH .

= 4.064 x 10⁻³ L of M NaOH

It will contain 4.064 x 10⁻³ moles of NaOH

4.064 x 10⁻³ moles of NaOH will react with 4.064 x 10⁻³ moles of unknown acid

1.512 g of acid = 1.512 / M moles of acid where M is molecular weight of acid

1.512 / M = 4.064 x 10⁻³

M = 1.512 /  4.064 x 10⁻³

= 372 .

Mol weight of acid = 372.

passed in september 1935, these laws are known as nuremberg laws.   they forbid jews from marrying but not directly forced them to divorce aryans. what is most noticeable is the fact that the jews were defranchised, meaning by this that they were not expected to have any civil rights, including the right to vote. the right answer is deprived of the right to vote.

1. the question asks the most appropriate, which seems to rule out "all of the above." your choice appears to be the correct one.

2. the protocol described is good for identifying correlation, but not cause and effect. for cause/effect, you need to devise a protocol that will assign the treatment (or not) to groups that have essentially the same "demographics" with respect to all the other variables. your choice regarding control group seems appropriate. random assignment of treatment (choice d) may be appropriate also. (i think you can argue that b and d are just different descriptions of the same method.)

3. d will randomize the birds, but may not guarantee there are 10 in each group. e will do both, so seems the better choice.

comment on question 2

based on the problem statement, it seems clear that confident, attentive drivers are more likely to use daytime running lights. so, the protocol might need to be devised in such a way that the lights would be turned on or off without the driver's knowledge. (an attentive driver will figure it out.) assigning a confident, attentive driver to a group required to drive without running lights might mess with his/her confidence and attentiveness. you don't want your experiment to do that. (nor do you want the experiment to subject a driver to greater risk of accident as a consequence of driving without running lights.) experiments involving human safety are always problematic.