What evidence supports a scientist's conclusion that fossil B is older than fossil A? Fossil A and fossil B were both found at the same depth below Earth's surface. Fossil B was found at a depth of 185 meters below Earth's surface, while fossil A was found at a depth of 50 meters below Earth's surface. O Fossil B was found at a depth of 50 meters below Earth's surface, while fossil A was found at a depth of 185 meters below Earth's surface. Fossil A was found below Earth's surface, while fossil B was found at surface level.

Fossil B was found at a depth of 185 meters below the Earth's surface, while fossil A was found at a depth of 50 meters below the Earth's surface.

Explanation:

Because if fossil B was found at a lower depth then it would be older than fossil A

Hope this helps, have a good day :)

Fossil B was found at a depth of 185 meters below Earth's surface, while fossil A was found at a depth of 50 meters below Earth's surface.

Explanation:

I hope this is an answer choice but this would support fossil B being older than fossil A bc the deeper the fossils are in the earth’s surface means that its older.

calculate how many grams of ammonia can be produced from 4.21 grams of

n2 + 3h2 = 2nh3

my answer:

25.0g n2 x (1 mol/ 28.0gn2) x (2 mol nh3/ 1 mol n2) x (17.0g nh3/ 1 molnh3) = 30.36g n2

25.0g h2 x (1 mol h2/ 2.00g h2) x (2 mol nh3/ 3 mol h2) x (17.0g nh3/ 1 mol nh3) = 141.67g h2

lr = n2

on passing the small ampere of electric current through the tube made of ar and hg of cfl generates uv rays which excites the fluorescent and thus emits the high radiation by consumption of just 5- 12 w in comparison to incandescent light which requires more power such as around 40 - 55 w to lighten.

moreover the life span of fluorescent or cfl is around 8000 h whereas the life span of incandescent is around 1200 h

hence, the building installed with incandescent lights bears more electricity bill.