Consider these reactions, where M represents a generic metal. 2M(s)+6HCl(aq)⟶2MCl3(aq)+3H2(g)ΔH1= −827.0 kJ 2M(s)+6HCl(aq)⟶2MCl3(aq)+3H2(g)ΔH1= −827.0 kJ HCl(g)⟶HCl(aq) ΔH2=−74.8 kJ HCl(g)⟶HCl(aq) ΔH2=−74.8 kJ H2(g)+Cl2(g)⟶2HCl(g) ΔH3=−1845.0 kJ H2(g)+Cl2(g)⟶2HCl(g) ΔH3=−1845.0 kJ MCl3(s)⟶MCl3(aq) ΔH4=−378.0 kJ MCl3(s)⟶MCl3(aq) ΔH4=−378.0 kJ Use the given information to determine the enthalpy of the reaction 2M(s)+3Cl2(g)⟶2MCl3(s)

The allotropes of carbon include a variety of structures that include three-dimensional tetrahedral lattices, planes of hexagonal rings, cylindrical tubes of hexagonal rings, and spheres of five- and six-membered rings. similar shapes of network covalent atomic solids are possible with carbon nitride, boron, and pure silicon (e.g., silicene is a graphene-like allotrope of pure silicon). in contrast, silicates exist as either highly ordered or amorphous (more random) three-dimensional lattices. what could explain why there are there no naturally occurring sheets, stacked sheets, cylindrical tubes, or spheres of network covalent atomic solids composed of silicon and oxygen (sio2)? would pure silicate structures make good lubricants or good electrical conductors?