Did the data support Martha's hypothesis? Use evidence to explain why or why not. if you feel the data were inconclusive, explain why.

Yes, the data supports the researchers hypothesis.

Explanation:

From the given data, in all the cases except the fanning event in females, the fish parents which was fed full ration appeared.

Take for example, 30.7 mouthing events in males given full ration as opposed to 24.5 events when they were fed on half ration.

answer : one can design an experiment using a liquid and an additive that can be added to the liquid and observe the chemical changes in the reaction species.

one would need a beaker which is filled with a known amount of the liquid in which thermometer is placed to measure the temperature changes; after addition of the additive to the liquid solution one can note down the temperature change and find whether the reaction is endothermic or exothermic in nature. by subtracting the initial temperature value with the final temperature one can find the temperature changes.

various combinations of liquid and additive can be used. liquid in this case can be a known quantity of water and additives can be epsom salt or without epsom salt the experiment can be conducted to notice the changes. water and ice, hydrogen peroxide and dry yeast, vinegar and baking soda,etc.