What is learned if the data from an experiment do not support the hypothesis

A hypothesis is seldom right, and ideas rarely become laws, but in many other words, scientifically established facts.

So, even if a hypothesis isn't validated, the experiment's scientists discover a new way of thinking about the assumption or new means to attain the hypothesis.

Even if a theory isn't proven, scientists consider it a win-win situation.

So, Option "C" is the correct answer to the following question.

link

Your answer should be C.

Explanation:

The reason is that, a hypothesis is very rarely correct, and in science, theories seldom become laws, or in other words, proven facts in science. So even when a hypothesis is not supported, the scientists in the experiment learn a new way to think about the hypothesis, or of other ways to achieve the hypothesis. When a hypothesis is not supported, scientists see it as a win win situation anyway.

Hopefully this helped!

8 m/s because for him to get the same amount of energy as ray is putting out, bobby, who weighs half as much as ray, needs to run twice as fast.

hi my dude or dudette