Object a has a positive charge after object a touches object b A still has a positive charge and the same amount of charge what can you infer about the charge of b

We can infer that the charge on object B is Neutrally charged.

Explanation:

From the above we can assume object B is neutral and was charged by induction.

During the process of charging by conduction, both objects A and B acquire the same type of charge after contact.

It follows the rule that says that if a positively charged object A is used to charge a neutral object B, then both objects A & B become charged positively charged.

to be fair, you have to have a very high iq to understand rick and morty. the humour is extremely subtle, and without a solid grasp of theoretical physics most of the jokes will go over a typical viewer's head. there's also rick's nihilistic outlook, which is deftly woven into his characterisation- his personal philosophy draws heavily from narodnaya volya literature, for instance. the fans understand this stuff; they have the intellectual capacity to truly appreciate the depths of these jokes, to realise that they're not just funny- they say something deep about life. as a consequence people who dislike rick & morty truly are idiots- of course they wouldn't appreciate, for instance, the humour in rick's existential catchphrase "wubba lubba dub dub," which itself is a cryptic reference to turgenev's russian epic fathers and sons. i'm smirking right now just imagining one of those addlepated simpletons scratching their heads in confusion as dan harmon's genius wit unfolds itself on their television screens. what fools.. how i pity them.

and yes, by the way, i do have a rick & morty tattoo. and no, you cannot see it. it's for the ladies' eyes only- and even then they have to demonstrate that they're within 5 iq points of my own (preferably lower) beforehand. nothin personnel kid

- decrease the number of plants and animals living in the water.