A. the reactant concentration in a zero-order reaction was 8.00×10−2 m after 155s and 3.00×10−2 m after 355s . what is the rate constant for this reaction?
b. what was the initial reactant concentration for the reaction described in part a?
c. the reactant concentration in a first-order reaction was 7.60×10−2 {\it m} after 35.0 s and 5.50×10−3 {\it m} after 85.0 s . what is the rate constant for this reaction?
d. the reactant concentration in a second-order reaction was 0.510 {\it m} after 205 s and 5.10×10−2 {\it m} after 805 s. what is the rate constant for this reaction?
the integrated rate laws for zero-, first-, and second-order reaction may be arranged such that they resemble the equation for a straight line, y = mx + b.
.order integrated rate law graph slope
0 [a] = -kt+[a] [a]~vs.}~t -k
1 ln[a] = -kt+ln[a]_0 ln[a]~vs.}~t -k
2 [a] =kt+1/a_0} 1/ [a]}~vs k

A) The rate constant is 2.50 × 10⁻⁴ M/s.

B) The initial concentration of the reactant is 11.9 × 10⁻² M.

C) The rate constant is 0.0525 s⁻¹

D) The rate constant is 0.0294 M⁻¹ s⁻¹

Explanation:

Hi there!

A) The equation for a zero-order reaction is the following:

[A] = -kt + [A₀]

Where:

[A] = concentrationo f reactant A at time t.

[A₀] = initial concentration of reactant A.

t = time.

k = rate constant.

We know that at t = 155 s, [A] = 8.00 × 10⁻² M and at t = 355 s [A] = 3.00 × 10⁻² M. Then:

8.00 × 10⁻² M = -k (155 s) +  [A₀]

3.00 × 10⁻² M = -k (355 s) + [A₀]

We have a system of 2 equations with 2 unknowns, let´s solve it!

Let´s solve the first equation for [A₀]:

8.00 × 10⁻² M = -k (155 s) +  [A₀]

8.00 × 10⁻² M + 155 s · k = [A₀]

Replacing [A₀] in the second equation:

3.00 × 10⁻² M = -k (355 s) + [A₀]

3.00 × 10⁻² M = -k (355 s) + 8.00 × 10⁻² M + 155 s · k

3.00 × 10⁻² M - 8.00 × 10⁻² M = -355 s · k + 155 s · k

-5.00 × 10⁻² M = -200 s · k

-5.00 × 10⁻² M/ -200 s = k

k = 2.50 × 10⁻⁴ M/s

The rate constant is 2.50 × 10⁻⁴ M/s

B) The initial reactant conentration will be:

8.00 × 10⁻² M + 155 s · k = [A₀]

8.00 × 10⁻² M + 155 s · 2.50 × 10⁻⁴ M/s = [A₀]

[A₀] = 11.9 × 10⁻² M

The initial concentration of the reactant is 11.9 × 10⁻² M

C) In this case, the equation is the following:

ln[A] = -kt + ln([A₀])

Then:

ln(7.60 × 10⁻² M) = -35.0 s · k + ln([A₀])

ln(5.50 × 10⁻³ M) = -85.0 s · k + ln([A₀])

Let´s solve the first equation for ln([A₀]) and replace it in the second equation:

ln(7.60 × 10⁻² M) = -35.0 s · k + ln([A₀])

ln(7.60 × 10⁻² M) + 35.0 s · k = ln([A₀]

Replacing ln([A₀]) in the second equation:

ln(5.50 × 10⁻³ M) = -85.0 s · k + ln([A₀])

ln(5.50 × 10⁻³ M) = -85.0 s · k + ln(7.60 × 10⁻² M) + 35.0 s · k

ln(5.50 × 10⁻³ M) -  ln(7.60 × 10⁻² M) = -85.0 s · k + 35.0 s · k

ln(5.50 × 10⁻³ M) -  ln(7.60 × 10⁻² M) = -50.0 s · k

(ln(5.50 × 10⁻³ M) -  ln(7.60 × 10⁻² M)) / -50.0 s = k

k = 0.0525 s⁻¹

The rate constant is 0.0525 s⁻¹

D) In a second order reaction, the equation is as follows:

1/[A] = 1/[A₀] + kt

Then, we have the following system of equations:

1/ 0.510 M = 1/[A₀] + 205 s · k

1/5.10 × 10⁻² M = 1/[A₀] + 805 s · k

Let´s solve the first equation for 1/[A₀]:

1/ 0.510 M = 1/[A₀] + 205 s · k

1/ 0.510 M - 205 s · k = 1/[A₀]

Now let´s replace 1/[A₀] in the second equation:

1/5.10 × 10⁻² M = 1/[A₀] + 805 s · k

1/5.10 × 10⁻² M = 1/ 0.510 M - 205 s · k + 805 s · k

1/5.10 × 10⁻² M - 1/ 0.510 M = - 205 s · k + 805 s · k

1/5.10 × 10⁻² M - 1/ 0.510 M = 600 s · k

(1/5.10 × 10⁻² M - 1/ 0.510 M)/ 600 s = k

k = 0.0294 M⁻¹ s⁻¹

The rate constant is 0.0294 M⁻¹ s⁻¹

the positions which points up in upward carbon and down in downward carbon are axial

and vice versa holds true for equatorial positions

so the correct answer with labelled diagram will be