An investigation involves determining which metal is better for making pots that will cook food faster. which is the best hypothesis to use for this investigation? copper is better than iron for making pots. copper is more malleable and heats up faster than iron. if copper is a better conductor, it will heat up faster than iron. if copper heats up faster than iron, it is better for making pots.

it can be observed without changing the identity of the object.

it depends on what substance you're talking about as well as many other factors. in quantum mechanics, the observation of particles affects the observers ability to measure certain properties. for example: you can know the velocity of a particle, but you can't know it's position; or you can know it's position, but not it's velocity. it's like trying to find out where a grain of sand is by throwing other grains of sand at it. once you find out where it is, it's been moved. it's also like trying to find an answer to the question of whether or not a tree falling in a forest makes a sound if nobody is there to hear it. paradoxically, the only way to find out is to be there and hear it.

wanswer:

explanation: