How was bohr’s atomic model different from rutherford’s atomic model? a. bohr’s model accounted for electrons that have different charges. b. bohr’s model could explain the structure of the nucleus. c. bohr’s model showed that electron orbits had distinct radii. d. bohr’s model could explain the wave nature of electrons. e. bohr’s model proved that atoms are unstable in nature.

• Rutherford model suggested a new look into the nature of the nucleus, whereas the Bohr model suggested a new look into the mechanics of electrons.

• Bohr model utilized the existing knowledge of the nucleus derived from the Rutherford model.

• Rutherford model is based on the experiments Rutherford conducted in collaboration with Geiger and Marsden. The Bohr model is based on existing experimental results.

C.  

Bohr’s model showed that electron orbits had distinct radii.

Explanation:

Bohr’s atomic model stated that electrons move in definite orbits. Electron shells are quantized. Electrons could move in the 1st, 2nd, 3rd shell etc. As electrons move in definite orbits they are at distinct distance from the nucleus. Thus each orbit has a distinct and different radii from the nucleus of the atom.

answer:

the reaction is type of combination reaction.

explanation:

on the product side, there are 2 molecules of bonded to fe   which means one atom of fe are combined two molecules of . so, balanced chemical equation becomes :

this reaction follows the reaction type of combination reaction. a combination reaction is defined as chemical reaction in which reactants combines together to form a single product.