subject
Business, 01.12.2021 03:40 slacker1738

10. Agreements and disagreements among economists regarding fiscalpolicy Consider a hypothetical economy in which households spend $0.50 of each additional dollar of their after-tax income. The expenditure multiplier for this economy is . Suppose that this economy is experiencing a recession. The government would like to stimulate aggregate demand and is deciding whether it should increase its spending by $1 billion or reduce income tax by $1 billion. Assume other things remain constant, and the marginal propensity to consume remains at 0.5. Before any multiplier effect takes place, a $1 billion increase in government spending will increase the aggregate demand by $ billion, while a $1 billion reduction in income tax will increase the aggregate demand by billion. Now consider the effect of each fiscal policy after the multiplier effect is complete. A $1 billion increase in government spending will result in a total increase of aggregate demand by $ billion, whereas a $1 billion reduction in income tax will result in a total increase of aggregate demand by $ billion. Keynesians believe that the multiplier effect of an increase in government spending will be that of a tax cut of the same amount. True or False: A government spending increase can generally begin to impact the economy more rapidly than a tax cut. True False

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Business

question
Business, 21.06.2019 14:50
Morris borrowed $9,000 from a credit union at 13% simple interest for 42 months. what were his money installment payments?
Answers: 3
question
Business, 21.06.2019 21:30
Recently, verizon wireless ran a pricing trial in order to estimate the elasticity of demand for its services. the manager selected three states that were representative of its entire service area and increased prices by 5 percent to customers in those areas. one week later, the number of customers enrolled in verizon's cellular plans declined 4 percent in those states, while enrollments in states where prices were not increased remained flat. the manager used this information to estimate the own-price elasticity of demand and, based on her findings, immediately increased prices in all market areas by 5 percent in an attempt to boost the company's 2016 annual revenues. one year later, the manager was perplexed because verizon's 2016 annual revenues were 10 percent lower than those in 2015"the price increase apparently led to a reduction in the company's revenues. did the manager make an error? yes - the one-week measures show demand is inelastic, so a price increase will decrease revenues. yes - the one-week measures show demand is elastic, so a price increase will reduce revenues. yes - cell phone elasticity is likely much larger in the long-run than the short-run. no - the cell phone market must have changed between 2011 and 2012 for this price increase to lower revenues.
Answers: 3
question
Business, 22.06.2019 01:30
The gomez company, a merchandising firm, has budgeted its activity for december according to the following information: • sales at $500,000, all for cash. • merchandise inventory on november 30 was $250,000. • the cash balance at december 1 was $20,000. • selling and administrative expenses are budgeted at $50,000 for december and are paid for in cash. • budgeted depreciation for december is $30,000. • the planned merchandise inventory on december 31 is $260,000. • the cost of goods sold represents 75% of the selling price. • all purchases are paid for in cash. the budgeted cash disbursements for december are:
Answers: 3
question
Business, 22.06.2019 01:30
For each example identify the most appropriate ctso
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
10. Agreements and disagreements among economists regarding fiscalpolicy Consider a hypothetical eco...
Questions
question
History, 29.08.2019 20:30
Questions on the website: 13722363