On January 1, 2018, Ackerman sold equipment to Brannigan (a wholly owned subsidiary) for $200,000 in cash. The equipment had originally cost $180,000 but had a book value of only $110,000 when transferred. On that date, the equipment had a five-year remaining life. Depreciation expense is computed using the straight-line method. Ackerman reported $300,000 in net income in 2018 (not including any investment income) while Brannigan reported $98,000. Ackerman attributed any excess acquisition-date fair value to Brannigan’s unpatented technology, which was amortized at a rate of $4,000 per year. a. What is consolidated net income for 2018?b. What is the parent’s share of consolidated net income for 2018 if Ackerman owns only 90 percent of Brannigan?c. What is the parent’s share of consolidated net income for 2018 if Ackerman owns only 90 percent of Brannigan and the equipment transfer was upstream?d. What is the consolidated net income for 2019 if Ackerman reports $320,000 (does not in

Afreelance​ singer-songwriter is planning the restoration of a recently purchased civil​ war-era farmhouse. while he professes an enjoyment​ of, and talent in the construction​ trades, the theory of comparative advantage implies that a. the value of what he imports​ (in this​ case, professional contractor​ services) must equal the value of what he exports​ (songs). b. he should concentrate on the restoration work since his​ out-of-pocket costs will be much lower than if he hires professionals. c. ​self-sufficiency is​ advantageous, hence he should split his time between music and construction. d. the income lost while away from music will likely exceed the savings realized by doing the work​ himself, thus, he should hire professionals to do the restoration work. e. he ought to do as much of the work himself as possible since imports​ (in this​ case, professional contractor​ services) should always be restricted to those things that cannot be done internall

Iam trying to get more members on my blog. how do i do this?

States that if there is no specific employment contract saying otherwise, the employer or employee may end an employment relationship at any time, regardless of cause. rule of fair treatment due-process policy rule of law employment flexibility employment at will