Klausenheimer Inc. just issued a $80 million bond. The bond has a coupon rate of 5% and a maturity of three years. The coupon is payable at the end of each year. The effective interest rate at the beginning of year 1 was 8%, beginning of year 2 was 5%, and beginning of year 3 was 2%. Make sure to show your calculations where applicable. a. Determine Klausenheimers proceeds from the bond issue.
b. If Klausenheimer decided to use the amortized cost method to account for the bonds, then what would be the interest and bond amortization for each of the three years. (similar to Exhibit 3.1 in the textbook)
c. If Klausenheimer decided to use the fair value method to account for the bonds, then what would be the interest, unrealized gain/loss, and total expense for each of the three years. (similar to Exhibit 3.1 in the textbook)
d. Explain why there is a difference between the amounts charged to income every year under the two methods.

marketing strategies should be established before marketing objectives are decided. t/f

The management of a private investment club has a fund of $250,000 earmarked for investment in stocks. to arrive at an acceptable overall level of risk, the stocks that management is considering have been classified into three categories: high risk (x), medium risk (y), and low risk (z). management estimates that high risk stocks will have a rate of return of 15%/year; medium risk stocks, 10%/year; and low risk stocks, 6%/year. the amount of money invested in low risk stocks is to be twice the sum of the amount invested in stocks of the other two categories. if the investment goal is to have a rate of return of 9% on the total investment, determine how much the club should invest in each type of stock. (assume that all the money available for investment is invested.)

Alandowner and his neighbor purchased adjoining undeveloped lots. after both built homes on their respective lots, the landowner suggested to the neighbor that a common driveway be built where the two lots joined. the neighbor agreed. the landowner and the neighbor split the cost of constructing the driveway and entered into a written agreement to equally share the costs of its upkeep and maintenance. the agreement was recorded in the county recorder's office. two years later, the neighbor built a new driveway located entirely on his lot. the common driveway, which the landowner continued to use but which the neighbor no longer used, began to deteriorate. the landowner asked the neighbor for money to maintain the common driveway, but the neighbor refused to contribute. three years later, the neighbor conveyed his lot to a friend. the friend entered into possession and used only the driveway built by the neighbor. by this time, the common driveway had deteriorated badly and contained numerous potholes. the landowner asked the friend to pay half of what it would take to repair the common driveway. the friend refused. the landowner repaired the driveway and sued the friend for 50% of the cost of repairs. will the landowner prevail?