subject
Business, 18.09.2021 09:20 selena827

Why do we need government support?

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Business

question
Business, 22.06.2019 08:40
Which of the following statements is true regarding the reporting of outside interests and the management of conflicts? investigators are responsible for developing their own management plans for significant financial interests. the institution must report identified financial conflicts of interest to the u.s. office of research integrity. investigators must disclose their significant financial interests related to their institutional responsibilities and not just those related to a particular project. investigators must disclose all of their financial interests regardless of whether they are related to a research project.
Answers: 3
question
Business, 22.06.2019 11:30
Amano s preguntes cationing to come fonds and consumer good 8. why did the u.s. government use rationing for some foods and consumer goods during world war ii?
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 22:00
Indicate whether each of the following companies is primarily a service, merchandise, or manufacturing business. if you are unfamiliar with the company, use the internet to locate the company's home page or use the finance web site of yahoo. 1. alcoa inc. 2. boeing 3. caterpillar 4. citigroup inc. 5. cvs 6. dow chemical company 7. ebay inc. 8. fedex 9. ford motor company 10. gap inc. 11. h& r block 12. hilton hospitality, inc. 13. procter & gamble 14. suntrust 15. walmart stores, inc.
Answers: 3
question
Business, 23.06.2019 15:00
How should the environmental effects be dealt with when evaluating this project? the environmental effects should be ignored since the plant is legal without mitigation. the environmental effects should be treated as a sunk cost and therefore ignored. if the utility mitigates for the environmental effects, the project is not acceptable. however, before the company chooses to do the project without mitigation, it needs to make sure that any costs of "ill will" for not mitigating for the environmental effects have been considered in the original analysis. the environmental effects should be treated as a remote possibility and should only be considered at the time in which they actually occur. the environmental effects if not mitigated would result in additional cash flows. therefore, since the plant is legal without mitigation, there are no benefits to performing a "no mitigation" analysis.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Why do we need government support?...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 23.09.2020 16:01
question
English, 23.09.2020 16:01
question
Chemistry, 23.09.2020 16:01
question
Mathematics, 23.09.2020 16:01
question
Mathematics, 23.09.2020 16:01
Questions on the website: 13722367