subject
Business, 09.09.2021 05:30 KittehMeow6039

Chapter 4 of our textbook is entitled External and Internal Organizational Environments and Corporate Culture. It covers the environment in which organizations operate, organizational structure, and organizational culture. All of these aspects are involved in the Wells Fargo case. Please read Chapter 4. The Critical Thinking Case at the end of chapter 4 on pages 116 - 8 is entitled Wells Fargo, Crisis and Scandal, and it is the basis for this project. Please read the Wells Fargo Critical Thinking Case, study the other resources included herein, and answer the questions below. (Note: For even more information on the Well Fargo scandal, there are links to additional resources at the end of the case on pages 117-18. The Critical Thinking Case at the end of chapter 5 also involves Wells Fargo. It is on pages 154 - 5 of our textbook, and there are links to additional resources there.)

The Wells Fargo Cross-Selling Scandal by Brian Tayan of Stanford University and posted on the Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance on February 6, 2019, is an excellent summary of the Wells Fargo scandal. (Note: The summary is adapted from a longer research paper by Mr. Tayan for the Stanford University Graduate School of Business.) Access the summary here:

The Wells Fargo Cross-Selling Scandal (Links to an external site.)

Wells Fargo has an official website with information about the settlement of this case. Access the site's home page here:

wfsettlement (Links to an external site.)

Questions (30 points total, 6 points each):

1. Which of Wells Fargo's past activities and practices helped create the conditions necessary for this scandal to happen? Specifically identify the relevant practices and activities.

2. How did Wells Fargo's organizational structure contribute to the problems that occurred? Specifically identify any relevant structural deficiencies.

3. Using relevant concepts and ideas from the chapter and the resources, analyze and diagnose the scandal. How could such a scandal have occurred in the first place? Specifically identify and explain who, and what, were at fault.

4. How might Wells Fargo prevent such a scandal from reoccurring? Specifically explain what actions you think Wells Fargo could take to avoid similar situations in the future, and why you think the actions would be helpful.

5. What was the total amount paid by Wells Fargo to settle this case? Considering the circumstances, do you think this amount is fair to all parties. Why? Explain.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Business

question
Business, 21.06.2019 22:30
An annuity that goes on indefinitely is called a perpetuity. the payments of a perpetuity constitute a/an series. the equation is: a stock with no maturity is an example of a perpetuity. quantitative problem: you own a security that provides an annual dividend of $170 forever. the security’s annual return is 9%. what is the present value of this security? round your answer to the nearest cent. $
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 12:40
When cell phones were first entering the market, they were relatively large and reception was undependable. all cell phones were essentially the same. but as the technology developed, many competitors entered, introducing features unique to their phones. today, cell phones are only a small fraction of the size and weight of their predecessors. consumers can buy cell phones with color screens, cameras, internet access, daily planners, or voice activation (and any combination of these features). the history of the cell phone demonstrates what marketing trend?
Answers: 3
question
Business, 22.06.2019 21:10
An investor purchases 500 shares of nevada industries common stock for $22.00 per share today. at t = 1 year, this investor receives a $0.42 per share dividend (which is not reinvested) on the 500 shares and purchases an additional 500 shares for $24.75 per share. at t = 2 years, he receives another $0.42 (not reinvested) per share dividend on 1,000 shares and purchases 600 more shares for $31.25 per share. at t = 3 years, he sells 1,000 of the shares for $35.50 per share and the remaining 600 shares at $36.00 per share, but receives no dividends. assuming no commissions or taxes, the money-weighted rate of return received on this investment is closest to:
Answers: 3
question
Business, 22.06.2019 21:20
In a market economy, supply and demand are important because theya. (i) play a critical role in the allocation of the economy's scarce resources.b. (ii) determine how much of each good gets produced.c. (iii) can be used to predict the impact on the economy of various events and policies.d. all of (i), (ii), and (iii) are correct.
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
Chapter 4 of our textbook is entitled External and Internal Organizational Environments and Corporat...
Questions
question
Social Studies, 19.03.2021 03:40
question
World Languages, 19.03.2021 03:40
Questions on the website: 13722360