subject
Business, 23.08.2021 01:00 winterblanco

Between 2011 and 2016, UK unemployment fell from a high of 8.5% to 4.8%. Some argue that Government attempts to reduce unemployment inevitably lead to trade-offs with other macroeconomic policy objectives.

1) Explain how government policies can reduce the natural rate of unemployment.

2) Discuss the view that falling unemployment will inevitably lead to trade-offs with other macroeconomic policy objectives.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Business

question
Business, 21.06.2019 19:00
What does the consumer price index measure? a. the change in prices of all goods and services over time b. the change in prices of specific goods and services over time c. the change in prices of final goods and services over time
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 20:00
In william rathje's garbology project that focused on household waste, front door interviews found 15 percent of respondents saying that they consumed beer. the trash discard from the same area showed what percentage of household's consuming beer
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 21:30
Which of the following best explains why online retail companies have an advantage over regular stores? a. their employees make less money because they mostly perform unskilled tasks. b. they are able to keep distribution costs low by negotiating deals with shipping companies. c. their transactions require expensive state-of-the-art technological devices. d. they have a larger number of potential customers because people anywhere can buy from them.
Answers: 1
question
Business, 23.06.2019 01:20
Suppose that fizzo and pop hop are the only two firms that sell orange soda. the following payoff matrix shows the profit (in millions of dollars) each company will earn depending on whether or not it advertises: pop hopadvertise doesn’t advertisefizzo advertise 10, 10 18, 2doesn’t advertise 2, 18 11, 11for example, the upper right cell shows that if fizzo advertises and pop hop doesn't advertise, fizzo will make a profit of $18 million, and pop hop will make a profit of $2 million. assume this is a simultaneous game and that fizzo and pop hop are both profit-maximizing firms.if fizzo decides to advertise, it will earn a profit if pop hop advertises and a profit if pop hop does not advertise.if fizzo decides not to advertise, it will earn a profit if pop hop advertises and a profit if pop hop does not advertise.if pop hop advertises, fizzo makes a higher profit if it chooses (not to advertise, to .if pop hop doesn't advertise, fizzo makes a higher profit if it chooses (not to advertise, to . suppose that both firms start off not advertising. if the firms act independently, what strategies will they end up choosing? fizzo will choose to advertise and pop hop will choose not to advertise.both firms will choose to advertise.fizzo will choose not to advertise and pop hop will choose to advertise.both firms will choose not to advertise.again, suppose that both firms start off not advertising. if the firms decide to collude, what strategies will they end up choosing? fizzo will choose not to advertise and pop hop will choose to advertise.both firms will choose not to advertise.fizzo will choose to advertise and pop hop will choose not to advertise.both firms will choose to advertise.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Between 2011 and 2016, UK unemployment fell from a high of 8.5% to 4.8%. Some argue that Governmen...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 24.11.2020 14:30
question
Geography, 24.11.2020 14:30
question
Social Studies, 24.11.2020 14:30
question
History, 24.11.2020 14:30
Questions on the website: 13722363