In the past year, we've gone through a lot. To mitigate the economic impact of the pandemic and government lockdowns, the federal government has been very active. Several well-respected economists on the left and right of the political spec feel the government has spent too much money and is sending us down a very bad path. Other, also well-respected economists, disagree and think the government is acting correctly. What do you think and why? Has fiscal and/or monetary policy done too much, too little, or just the right amount of stimulus? What are the macroeconomic repercussions of your analysis?

For full credit, each student must contribute a minimum 300-word.
**PLEASE ANSWER WITH AT LEAST 200 WORDS**

Which type of investment offers both capital gains and interest income? a. property b. cds c. stocks d. bonds

When borrowers want funding to pay for different projects, they go to the loanable funds market and acquire funds through either indirect finance or direct finance. below, you are given five different scenarios. is each an example of direct finance or indirect finance?

In december of 2004, the company you own entered into a 20-year contract with a grain supplier for daily deliveries of grain to its hot dog bun manufacturing facility. the contract called for "10,000 pounds of grain" to be delivered to the facility at the price of $100,000 per day. until february 2017, the supplier provided processed grain which could easily be used in your manufacturing process. however, no longer wanting to absorb the cost of having the grain processed, the supplier began delivering whole grain. the supplier is arguing that the contract does not specify the type of grain that would be supplied and that it has not breached the contract. your company is arguing that the supplier has an onsite processing plant and processed grain was implicit to the terms of the contract. over the remaining term of the contract, reshipping and having the grain processed would cost your company approximately $10,000,000, opposed to a cost of around $1,000,000 to the supplier. after speaking with in-house counsel, it was estimated that litigation would cost the company several million dollars and last for years. weighing the costs of litigation, along with possible ambiguity in the contract, what are three options you could take to resolve the dispute? which would be the best option for your business and why?