Oficina Bonita Company manufactures office furniture. An unfinished desk is produced for $37.65 and sold for $65.35. A finished desk can be sold for $74.50. The additional processing cost to complete the finished desk is $6.60. Prepare a differential analysis. Round your answers to two decimal places.

Alternative 1 $27.7

Alternative 2 $30.25

Differential effects $2.55

Explanation:

Preparation of a differential analysis

DIFFERENTIAL ANALYSIS

Sell unfinished desks(Alternative 1 ) Process further into finished desks (Alternative 2) Differential effect (Alternative 2)

Revenue per desk $65.35 $74.50 $9.15

($74.50-$65.35=$9.15)

Cost per desk - $37.65 -$44.25 -$6.60

($37.65+$6.60=$44.25)

Profit /Loss per desk $27.7 $30.25 $2.55

($65.35 - $37.65=$27.7)

($74.50-$44.25=$30.25)

($9.15-$6.60=$2.55)

Therefore the company should process further and sell finished desks because it yields incremental Profit per desk.

in 2001, dell computer became the world’s largest personal computer vendor, continuing to

gain market share and post profits in an industry struggling with slumping sales and billions of

dollars in losses. dell sells 90% of its pcs directly to the final customer, largely bypassing the

reseller channel that accounts for most of the world’s pc sales. this direct customer relationship

is the key to dell’s business model, and provides distinct advantages over the indirect sales

model. dell’s direct relationship with the customer allows it to tailor its offerings to customer

needs, offer add-on products and services, and use the internet to offer a variety of customer

services. in addition, dell’s pcs are built to customers’ specifications upon receipt of an order,

giving dell additional advantages over indirect pc vendors who must try to forecast demand and

ship products based on those forecasts. dell’s direct sales and build-to-order model has achieved

superior performance in the pc industry in terms of inventory turnover, reduced overhead, cash

conversion, and return on investment (kraemer, et al., 2000).

explanation:

i believe the answer would have to be a dependable person