subject
Business, 30.07.2021 04:10 sarinawhitaker

Solo Inc. issued 2,500 of its 9%, $1,000 bonds at 99. Interest is payable semiannually on January 1 and July 1. The bonds mature on January 1, 2031. Solo paid $50,000 in bond issue costs. Solo uses straight-line amortization. The amount of interest expense for 2021 is:

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Business

question
Business, 21.06.2019 18:20
Elon musk is the ceo of tesla motors. musk also serves as chairman of tesla's board. according to corporate governance theory, which of the following is a logical reason why musk should serve on the board? 1. he serves on many other boards, including that of a major client of tesla.2. his is an independent director who is well positioned to monitor the company's management.3. he can easily fire board members that are shirking their duties.4. he can provide the board with valuable inside information about the firm and the industry.
Answers: 1
question
Business, 21.06.2019 22:30
Before contacting the news or print media about your business, what must you come up with first ? a. a media expertb. a big budgetc. a track recordd. a story angle
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 04:50
Steffi is reviewing various licenses and their uses. match the licenses to their respective uses. you are eligible to work within the state. you are eligible to sell limited investment securities. you are eligible to sell fixed income investment products. your compensation is fee based. section 6 section 7 section 63 section 65
Answers: 3
question
Business, 22.06.2019 07:50
In december of 2004, the company you own entered into a 20-year contract with a grain supplier for daily deliveries of grain to its hot dog bun manufacturing facility. the contract called for "10,000 pounds of grain" to be delivered to the facility at the price of $100,000 per day. until february 2017, the supplier provided processed grain which could easily be used in your manufacturing process. however, no longer wanting to absorb the cost of having the grain processed, the supplier began delivering whole grain. the supplier is arguing that the contract does not specify the type of grain that would be supplied and that it has not breached the contract. your company is arguing that the supplier has an onsite processing plant and processed grain was implicit to the terms of the contract. over the remaining term of the contract, reshipping and having the grain processed would cost your company approximately $10,000,000, opposed to a cost of around $1,000,000 to the supplier. after speaking with in-house counsel, it was estimated that litigation would cost the company several million dollars and last for years. weighing the costs of litigation, along with possible ambiguity in the contract, what are three options you could take to resolve the dispute? which would be the best option for your business and why?
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Solo Inc. issued 2,500 of its 9%, $1,000 bonds at 99. Interest is payable semiannually on January 1...
Questions
question
Geography, 03.08.2019 20:00
Questions on the website: 13722367