Suppose the government wants to increase​ farmers' incomes. Why do price supports or​ acreage-limitation programs cost society more than simply giving farmers​ money? A. A price support reduces the quantity demanded by​ consumers, which results in a loss of surplus that is not captured by farmers or consumers. Giving farmers money results in a smaller deadweight loss because it is merely a redistribution of surplus from one group to the other. B. A price support forces an increase in demand by​ consumers, which results in a loss of consumer surplus that is not captured by farmers​ (deadweight loss). Giving farmers money results in a smaller deadweight loss because it is merely a redistribution of surplus from one group to the other. C. A price support forces an increase in demand by​ consumers, which results in a loss of consumer surplus that is not captured by farmers​ (deadweight loss). Giving farmers money​ doesn't result in any deadweight loss but is merely a redistribution of surplus from one group to the other. D. A price support reduces the quantity demanded by​ consumers, which results in a loss of surplus that is not captured by farmers or consumers. Giving farmers money​ doesn't result in any deadweight loss but is merely a redistribution of surplus from one group to the other.