Calculate a one-year holding period return (HPR) for the following two investment alternstives: Investment X YCash received 1st quarter $1.23 $0.00 2nd quarter $1.59 $0.003rd quartor $0.00 $0.004th quarter $3.05 $1.87Investment value Beginning of year 39.17 $45.18 End of year $36.89 $48.17 1) The HPR for investment X is. 2) The HPR for investment Y is. 3) Which, if any, of the return components is likely not to be realized if you continue to hold each of the investments beyond 1 year? 4) Which, if any, of the return components is likely not to be realized if you continue to hold each of the investments beyond 1 year? A. If the investments are held beyond 1 year, only the capital loss on Investment X would not be realized; the capital gain on Investment Y would be realized. B. If the investments are held beyond 1 year, only the current income on Investment Y would not be realized; the current income on Investment X would be realized because these cash flows occur earlier in the investment period. C. If the investments are held beyond 1 year, the capital gain (loss) component would not be realized and would likely change. D. If the investments are held beyond 1 year, the current income component would not be realized and would likely change.

How are interest rates calculated by financial institutions? financial institutions generally calculate interest as (1) interest or (.

What do you recommend adam do to increase production in a business setting that does not seem to value high productivity?

Cooper sues company a in state court in south carolina, where he lives, for negligence alleging personal injury and property damage of $100,000 after a truck driven by an employee of company a rear-ended his pickup truck. company a is incorporated in delaware, has its headquarters in new york, but does a substantial amount of business in south carolina. claiming diversity of citizenship, company a seeks removal to federal district court, but cooper opposes the motion. which of the following is true regarding whether the case may be properly removed to federal district court? the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and if company a's nerve center is in a state other than south carolina, then the case may be properly removed to federal court.the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and because company a is incorporated and has its headquarters in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is incorporated in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a's headquarters, nerve center, or principal place of business is located.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is headquartered in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a is incorporated and regardless of the location of its nerve center.because the amount in controversy fails to satisfy jurisdictional requirements, regardless of the location of company a, the case may not be removed to federal court.