The Campbell Company is considering adding a robotic paint sprayer to its production line. The sprayer's base price is $1,070,000, and it would cost another $23,000 to install it. The machine falls into the MACRS 3-year class, and it would be sold after 3 years for $560,000. The MACRS rates for the first three years are 0.3333, 0.4445, and 0.1481. The machine would require an increase in net working capital (inventory) of $14,000. The sprayer would not change revenues, but it is expected to save the firm $384,000 per year in before-tax operating costs, mainly labor. Campbell's marginal tax rate is 25%. a. What is the Year 0 net cash flow? b. What are the net operating cash flows in Years 1, 2, 3?
c. What is the additional Year 3- cash flow (i. e. after tax salvage and the return of working capital)?
d. If the project's cost of capital is 12%, should the machine be purchased?

What does the consumer price index measure? a. the change in prices of all goods and services over time b. the change in prices of specific goods and services over time c. the change in prices of final goods and services over time

What is the most important factor that affects the value of a company? a) cash flow b) earnings c) supply and demand d) number of employees

Alandowner entered into a written agreement with a real estate broker whereby the broker would receive a commission of 10% of the sale price if he procured a "ready, willing, and able buyer" for the landowner's property and if the sale actually proceeded through closing. the broker found a buyer who agreed in writing to buy the property from the landowner for $100,000, the landowner's asking price. the buyer put up $6,000 as a down payment. the agreement between the landowner and the buyer contained a liquidated damages clause providing that, if the buyer defaulted by failing to tender the balance due of $94,000 at the closing date, damages would be 10% of the purchase price. the landowner included that clause because she was counting on using the proceeds of the sale for a business venture that would likely net her at least $10,000. the buyer became seriously ill and defaulted. when he recovered, he demanded that the landowner return his $6,000, and the landowner refused. the broker also demanded the $6,000 from the landowner and was refused. the broker and the buyer filed separate suits against the landowner, with the buyer pleading impossibility of performance. the two cases are consolidated into a single case. how should the court rule as to the disposition of the $6,000?