Priyanka is a branch manager at a bank in town. She hires Hudson, who comes with strong references and several years' experience, as a bank teller. Several months later, Priyanka is surprised to be personally named in a lawsuit alleging that Hudson misrepresented the bank's products by promising new account holders $1,000 for starting a savings account. Is Priyanka, as Hudson's manager, personally liable for the tort

Yes. because Priyanka is Hudson's manager and so his liability extends to her.

Explanation:

Based on the information given, it should be noted that Priyanka, as Hudson's manager, personally liable for the tort.

In this case, Priyanka is Hudson's manager and so his liability extends to her. Priyanka will be liable based on the employee-employer ground and will be liable since she hired Hudson.

n

explanation:

answer; communication channel;