A customer at a bakery ordered a cake, which the bakery stated was made by an independent third party. The cake contained small shards of metal. The metal was not detected by the bakery, even though the bakery conducted a reasonable inspection of the cake and otherwise had no reason to suspect that the cake contained the metal. The customer ate the cake and immediately incurred serious injuries from eating the shards of metal. The customer brought suit against the bakery based on strict products liability for injuries suffered from eating the cake. Who will prevail

A. the customer, because the bakery was a commercial supplier of the dessert.

Explanation:

Since in the question it is mentioned that after eating the cake the customer has the serious injuries so the customer suit against the bakery so here the customer should prevail as the bakery was the supplier of the dessert in the commercial manner

Hence, the option a is correct

idk the answer so dont listen to me but 23

the answer would be voluntary exchange -

"the act of buyers and sellers freely and willingly engaging in market transactions. moreover, transactions are made in such a way that both the buyer and the seller are better off after the exchange than before it occurred."

hope this : )

-shy