The concepts statements provide several examples in which specific quantitative materiality guidelines are provided to firms. Identify at least two of these examples. Do you think materiality guidelines should be quantified

Two examples of materiality are:

1.Separate disclosure of balance sheet items - If 10% or more of their immediate  category or more than 5% of total assets.

2.Receivables from officers and stockholders - Disclose details of receivables from any  officer or principal stockholder if it equals or exceeds $20,000 or 1% of total assets.

Explanation:

Material guidelines indicate the relevance of a specific financial information by creating a set of quantitative materiality guides or criteria that addresses a variety of financial situations and is used as an authoritative support.

The predominant view among FASB is that materiality judgments can properly be made only by those who have all the facts and not relying on a formulated numerical guides.  

However, I personally feel that the materiality guidelines should be quantified. Having a formulated set of standards would make it easier for decision makers to analyze the impacts that any material transaction could have on financial statements and the ongoing concerns of the organization.  By having such guidelines, the relevance of certain situations would be universally understood with a unified approach.

it's actually a very difficult task, due to not many people can make 2 million dollars in 2 years. besides that, to the not-so-realistic ideas, you can create a business. it could be practically anything, but make it into a business that isn't that known yet, you get me? also, lets not forget about stock market. that's where all the good stuff happens. use investments at the beginning and begin to raise up your business or whatever you're going to do. as this is a very non-realistic idea, it's still worth the shot!

answeri believe this is (true );