If the marginal propensity to consume is 0.75, and there is no investment accelerator or crowding out, a $115 billion increase in government expenditures would shift the aggregate demand curve right by $460 billion, but the effect would be smaller if there were an investment accelerator. $345 billion, but the effect would be smaller if there were an investment accelerator. $345 billion, but the effect would be larger if there were an investment accelerator. $460 billion, but the effect would be larger if there were an investment accelerator.

$460 billion, but the effect would be larger if there were an investment accelerator.

Explanation:

If the MPC = 0.75 and there is no investment accelerator or crowding out, then a $115 billion increase in the government expenditures would result in the shift in the aggregate demand curve right by:

= $115 billion ÷ (1 - 0.75)

= $115 billion ÷ 0.25

= $115 billion × 1/0.25

= $115 billion / 0.25

= $460 billion.

Therefore, there'll be a shift in the aggregate demand curve right by $460 billion, but the effect would be larger if there were an investment accelerator

the correct option is c

answer; ///(d); determining who competes most closely   with whom evaluating whether industry driving forces and competitive pressure favor some strategic groups and hurt others, and ascertaining whether the profit potential of different strategic groups varies due to the strengths and weaknesses in each groups respective market positions;