Business, 21.04.2021 21:40 cam1976

On January 1, 2020, the stockholders’ equity section of Sarasota Corporation shows common stock ($5 par value) $1,500,000; paid-in capital in excess of par $1,050,000; and retained earnings $1,230,000. During the year, the following treasury stock transactions occurred. Oct. 1; Sold 8,500 treasury shares for cash at $14 per share. Restate the entry for October 1, assuming the treasury shares were sold at $11 per share. ACCOUNTS ARE:
Cash Dr. (8,500 × $11) = $93,500
Paid in capital from treasury stock Dr. ?
retained earnings Dr. ?
treasury stock Cr. (8,500 × $15) = $127,500

Answers: 1

Show answers

Another question on Business

Business, 22.06.2019 01:20

Suppose a stock had an initial price of $65 per share, paid a dividend of $1.45 per share during the year, and had an ending share price of $58. a, compute the percentage total return. (a negative answer should be indicated by a minus sign. do not round intermediate calculations and enter your answer as a percent rounded to 2 decimal places, e.g., 32.16.) b. what was the dividend yield and the capital gains yield? (a negative answer should be indicated by a minus sign. do not round intermediate calculations and enter your answers as a percent rounded to 2 decimal places, e.g., 32.16.)

Answers: 2

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 01:50

You are an employee of an u.s. firm that produces personal computers in thailand and then exports them to the united states and other countries for sale. the personal computers were originally produced in thailand to take advantage of relatively low labor costs and a skilled workforce. other possible locations considered at that time were malaysia and hong kong. the u.s. government decides to impose punitive 100% ad valorem tariffs on imports of computers from thailand to punish the country for administrative trade barriers that restrict u.s. exports to thailand. how do you think your firm should respond? what does this tell you about the use of targeted trade barriers?

Answers: 3

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 05:00

You are chairman of the board of a successful technology firm. there is a nominal federal corporate tax rate of 35 percent, yet the effective tax rate of the typical corporation is about 12.6%. your firm has been clever with use of transfer pricing and keeping money abroad and has barely paid any taxes over the last 5 years; during this same time period, profits were $28 billion. one member of the board feels that it is un-american to use various accounting strategies in order to avoid paying taxes. others feel that these are legal loopholes and corporations have a fiduciary responsibility to minimize taxes. one board member quoted what the ceo of exxon once said: “i’m not a u.s. company and i don’t make decisions based on what’s good for the u.s.” what are the alternatives? what are your recommendations? why do you recommend this course of action?

Answers: 2

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 16:30

Corrective action must be taken for a project when (a) actual progress to the planned progress shows the progress is ahead of schedule. (b) the technical specifications have been met. (c) the actual cost of the activities is less than the funds received for the work completed. (d) the actual progress is less than the planned progress.

Answers: 2

Answer

You know the right answer?

On January 1, 2020, the stockholders’ equity section of Sarasota Corporation shows common stock ($5...

Questions