National Park Tours Co. is a travel agency. The nine transactions recorded by National Park Tours during May 2019, its first month of operations, are indicated in the following T accounts: Cash Equipment Beth Worley, Drawing (1) 34,700 (2) 2,450 (3) 25,000 (9) 3,500 (7) 13,900 (3) 4,500 (4) 3,800 (6) 10,400 (9) 3,500 Accounts Receivable Accounts Payable Fees Earned (5) 18,750 (7) 13,900 (6) 10,400 (3) 20,500 (5) 18,750 Supplies Beth Worley, Capital Operating Expenses (2) 2,450 (8) 1,400 (1) 34,700 (4) 3,800 (8) 1,400 a. Prepare an unadjusted trial balance, listing the accounts in their proper order. Place the amounts in the proper columns. If an entry is not required in an amount box, leave it blank. National Park Tours Co. Unadjusted Trial Balance May 31, 2019

What is the difference between a government and a state

For each separate case below, follow the 3-step process for adjusting the prepaid asset account at december 31. step 1: determine what the current account balance equals. step 2: determine what the current account balance should equal. step 3: record the december 31 adjusting entry to get from step 1 to step 2. assume no other adjusting entries are made during the year. a. prepaid insurance. the prepaid insurance account has a $4,700 debit balance to start the year. a re- view of insurance policies and payments shows that $900 of unexpired insurance remains at year-end. b. prepaid insurance. the prepaid insurance account has a $5,890 debit balance at the start of the year. a review of insurance policies and payments shows $1,040 of insurance has expired by year-end. c.prepaidrent.onseptember1ofthecurrentyear,thecompanyprepaid$24,000 for 2 years of rentfor facilities being occupied that day. the company debited prepaid rent and credited cash for $24,000.

In december of 2004, the company you own entered into a 20-year contract with a grain supplier for daily deliveries of grain to its hot dog bun manufacturing facility. the contract called for "10,000 pounds of grain" to be delivered to the facility at the price of $100,000 per day. until february 2017, the supplier provided processed grain which could easily be used in your manufacturing process. however, no longer wanting to absorb the cost of having the grain processed, the supplier began delivering whole grain. the supplier is arguing that the contract does not specify the type of grain that would be supplied and that it has not breached the contract. your company is arguing that the supplier has an onsite processing plant and processed grain was implicit to the terms of the contract. over the remaining term of the contract, reshipping and having the grain processed would cost your company approximately $10,000,000, opposed to a cost of around $1,000,000 to the supplier. after speaking with in-house counsel, it was estimated that litigation would cost the company several million dollars and last for years. weighing the costs of litigation, along with possible ambiguity in the contract, what are three options you could take to resolve the dispute? which would be the best option for your business and why?