Llungby AB spent 1,000,000 krone in 2020 on the development of a new product. The company determined that 25 percent of this amount was incurred after the criteria in IAS 36 for capitalization as an intangible asset had been met. The newly developed product is brought to market in January 2021 and is expected to generate sales revenue for five years. Assume that Llungby AB is a foreign company using IFRS and is owned by a company using U. S. GAAP. Thus, IFRS balances must be converted to U. S. GAAP to prepare consolidated financial statements. Ignore income taxes. Required: Prepare journal entries for development costs for the years ending December 31, 2020, and December 31, 2021, under (1) IFRS and (2) U. S. GAAP. Prepare the entry(ies) that the U. S. parent would make on the December 31, 2020, and December 31, 2021, conversion worksheets to convert IFRS balances to U. S. GAAP.

Cooper sues company a in state court in south carolina, where he lives, for negligence alleging personal injury and property damage of $100,000 after a truck driven by an employee of company a rear-ended his pickup truck. company a is incorporated in delaware, has its headquarters in new york, but does a substantial amount of business in south carolina. claiming diversity of citizenship, company a seeks removal to federal district court, but cooper opposes the motion. which of the following is true regarding whether the case may be properly removed to federal district court? the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and if company a's nerve center is in a state other than south carolina, then the case may be properly removed to federal court.the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and because company a is incorporated and has its headquarters in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is incorporated in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a's headquarters, nerve center, or principal place of business is located.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is headquartered in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a is incorporated and regardless of the location of its nerve center.because the amount in controversy fails to satisfy jurisdictional requirements, regardless of the location of company a, the case may not be removed to federal court.