subject
Business, 01.04.2021 19:30 thawngmawi

Terry Jones sits on the board of directors of Exercise Unlimited, Inc. In return for his services on the board, Jones receives unlimited membership privileges for his family at all Exercise Unlimited facilities. Jones purchases Exercise Unlimited stock for the client accounts for which it is appropriate. Jones does not disclose this arrangement to his employer because he does not receive monetary compensation for his services to the board. Did Terry violate Standards of Professional Conduct

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Business

question
Business, 22.06.2019 10:30
Perez, inc., applies the equity method for its 25 percent investment in senior, inc. during 2018, perez sold goods with a 40 percent gross profit to senior, which sold all of these goods in 2018. how should perez report the effect of the intra-entity sale on its 2018 income statement?
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 19:10
Fortress international, a large conglomerate, procures a few component parts from external suppliers and also manufactures some of the key raw materials in its own subsidiaries. aside from this, the company does not solely depend on outside distributors to reach its customers. in fact, it has its own retail stores to distribute its products. in this scenario, which of the following alternatives to vertical integration is fortress international applying? a. concentric integration b. taper integration c. horizontal integration d. conglomerate integration
Answers: 1
question
Business, 23.06.2019 11:40
An airline estimates that 98% of people booked on their flights actually show up. if the airline books 61 people on a flight for which the maximum number is 59 (the capacity of the plane), what is the probability that the number of people who show up will exceed the capacity of the plane?
Answers: 1
question
Business, 23.06.2019 15:00
How should the environmental effects be dealt with when evaluating this project? the environmental effects should be ignored since the plant is legal without mitigation. the environmental effects should be treated as a sunk cost and therefore ignored. if the utility mitigates for the environmental effects, the project is not acceptable. however, before the company chooses to do the project without mitigation, it needs to make sure that any costs of "ill will" for not mitigating for the environmental effects have been considered in the original analysis. the environmental effects should be treated as a remote possibility and should only be considered at the time in which they actually occur. the environmental effects if not mitigated would result in additional cash flows. therefore, since the plant is legal without mitigation, there are no benefits to performing a "no mitigation" analysis.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Terry Jones sits on the board of directors of Exercise Unlimited, Inc. In return for his services on...
Questions
question
Computers and Technology, 08.02.2021 21:10
question
Health, 08.02.2021 21:10
question
Mathematics, 08.02.2021 21:10
Questions on the website: 13722367