Jaspal has a severe heart attack and is taken to the hospital. He is aware that he is not expected to live. Because he is a bachelor with no close relatives nearby, Jaspal gives his car keys to his close friend Friedrich, telling Friedrich that he is expected to die and that the car is Friedrich’s. Jaspal survives the heart attack, but two months later he dies from pneumonia. Sam, Jaspal’s uncle and the executor of his estate, wants Friedrich to return the car. Friedrich refuses, claiming that the car was a gift from Jaspal. Discuss whether Friedrich will be required to return the car to Jaspal’s estate. .5. The additional rules for a gift (A. inter vivos B. causa mortis ) are that the gift is not (A. absolute B. actually delivered C. valid) until the donor dies from the contemplated event, and the gift is (A. automatically B. never C. potentially) revoked if the donor survives the contemplated event.6. Because Jaspal was in the hospital after a severe heart attack and did not believe he would survive, if his actions were a gift, they would be a gift (A. inter vivos B. causa mortis )7. Jaspal’s action of handing the keys to Friedrich and telling Friedrich that he expected to die so the car is Friedrich’s would indicate the (A. intent B. documentation C. hope) to make a gift, as well as constitute the (A. delivery B. revocation) of the gift to Friedrich.8. When Friedrich took the keys and began driving the car, it was an (A. rejection B. acceptance C. condition) of the gift.