Eun-Sang is a highly respected person within her community. She is Asian in a largely Caucasian-populated area. Since Eun-Sang was looking for a new job, she went to a new company in the area called Manna's Coffee, where she applied for a position. After the interview, Eun-Sang felt confident that she would be hired because of her qualifications. However, she did not get a call back. Initially, Eun did not think twice about it, but she felt differently when she visited the same coffee store later to purchase something for a friend. The company had hired an inexperienced Caucasian male with a history of unemployment. At this point, Eun-Sang was quite aggravated, but she left the issue alone. She ended up asking an associate for an espresso machine. The employee informed Eun-Sang where the machine was located and retrieved it for her. Eun-Sang asked if there were any other espresso machines of higher quality. When the associate said no, Eun-Sang purchased the item and left. After she gave the gift to her friend, she noticed a much better quality espresso machine that someone else had given her. Eun-Sang asked where they had purchased it, and they responded, "Manna's Coffee."



Refer to Manna's Coffee. Which basic consumer right was infringed when Eun-Sang bought the espresso machine?
Select one: