Suppose Becky earns $650 per week working as an analyst for A-plus Accountants. She uses $10 to order a mojito cocktail at Little Havana. Little Havana pays Alex $250 per week to wait tables. Alex uses $250 to purchase tax services from A-Plus Accountants. Identify whether each of the following events in this scenario occurs in the resource market or the product market.

a. Alex earns $250 per week working for Little Havana. (Resource Market / Product Market)
b. Becky spends $10 to order a mojito cocktail. (Resource Market / Product Market)
c. Becky earns $650 per week working for A-Plus Accountants. (Resource Market / Product Market)

Which of the elements of this scenario represent a flow from a household to a firm? This could be a flow of dollars, inputs, or outputs. Check all that apply.

( ) The mojito Becky receives
( ) The $250 Alex spends to purchase tax services from A-Plus Accountants
( ) The $250 per week Alex earns working for Little Havana
( ) Becky's labor

Suppose that a monopolistically competitive restaurant is currently serving 260 meals per day (the output where mr

How does hipaa address employee’s access to e-phi?

Cooper sues company a in state court in south carolina, where he lives, for negligence alleging personal injury and property damage of $100,000 after a truck driven by an employee of company a rear-ended his pickup truck. company a is incorporated in delaware, has its headquarters in new york, but does a substantial amount of business in south carolina. claiming diversity of citizenship, company a seeks removal to federal district court, but cooper opposes the motion. which of the following is true regarding whether the case may be properly removed to federal district court? the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and if company a's nerve center is in a state other than south carolina, then the case may be properly removed to federal court.the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and because company a is incorporated and has its headquarters in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is incorporated in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a's headquarters, nerve center, or principal place of business is located.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is headquartered in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a is incorporated and regardless of the location of its nerve center.because the amount in controversy fails to satisfy jurisdictional requirements, regardless of the location of company a, the case may not be removed to federal court.