subject
Business, 09.11.2020 17:00 manou76

Suppose you bought two pieces of land for $100,000 each, the first piece has permanently appreciated in value and is now worth $120,000, while the second piece has permanently reduced in value to $75,000. Applying conservatism and the historical cost principles, how would you account for the change in value of the two pieces of land? a. I would leave both pieces of land at $100,000 each on the books.
b. I would leave the first piece of land at $100,000 and write the second down to $75,000.
c. I would write up the first piece of land to $120,000 and the second down to $75,000.
d. I would write the first piece of land up to $120,000, and leave the second piece of land at $100,000.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Business

question
Business, 21.06.2019 21:00
Exercise 8-6 goods in transit [lo8-2] the kwok company's inventory balance on december 31, 2016, was $190,000 (based on a 12/31/16 physical count) before considering the following transactions: 1. goods shipped to kwok f.o.b. destination on december 20, 2016, were received on january 4, 2017. the invoice cost was $35,000. 2. goods shipped to kwok f.o.b. shipping point on december 28, 2016, were received on january 5, 2017. the invoice cost was $22,000. 3. goods shipped from kwok to a customer f.o.b. destination on december 27, 2016, were received by the customer on january 3, 2017. the sales price was $45,000 and the merchandise cost $27,000. 4. goods shipped from kwok to a customer f.o.b. destination on december 26, 2016, were received by the customer on december 30, 2016. the sales price was $25,000 and the merchandise cost $18,000. 5. goods shipped from kwok to a customer f.o.b. shipping point on december 28, 2016, were received by the customer on january 4, 2017. the sales price was $30,000 and the merchandise cost $17,000. required: determine the correct inventory amount to be reported in kwok's 2016 balance sheet.
Answers: 1
question
Business, 21.06.2019 23:30
Which term refers to the cost that motivates an economic decision
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 02:40
Which of the following statements about brand names is true? brand names give the seller an incentive to provide consistently high-quality products and services in order to protect the reputation of the brand. brand names are always economically wasteful since they dupe consumers into buying more expensive goods and services that are no different from generic versions. it is always rational to prefer brand names over generic substitutes. read the following example and determine whether it illustrates a common critique or defense of advertising. musashi sees a commercial for a brand x clothing company that depicts the wearers of the clothes out having a good time with friends. although he doesn't particularly need new clothes, the commercial prompts him to buy a brand x t-shirt.
Answers: 3
question
Business, 22.06.2019 02:40
Aquatic marine stores company manufactures special metallic materials and decorative fittings for luxury yachts that require highly skilled labor. aquatic uses standard costs to prepare its flexible budget. for the first quarter of the year, direct materials and direct labor standards for one of their popular products were as follows: direct materials: 3 pounds per unit; $ 6 per pound direct labor: 4 hours per unit; $ 19 per hour during the first quarter, aquatic produced 5 comma 000 units of this product. actual direct materials and direct labor costs were $ 65 comma 000 and $ 330 comma 000, respectively. for the purpose of preparing the flexible budget, calculate the total standard direct materials cost at a production volume of 5 comma 000 units.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Suppose you bought two pieces of land for $100,000 each, the first piece has permanently appreciated...
Questions
question
Chemistry, 23.02.2022 14:50
question
Mathematics, 23.02.2022 14:50
Questions on the website: 13722361