Comparative financial statement data for Bridgeport Corp. and Sarasota Corp., two competitors, appear below. All balance sheet data are as of December 31, 2017. Bridgeport Corp. Sarasota Corp.
2017 2017
Net sales $2,340,000 $806,000
Cost of goods sold 1,527,500 442,000
Operating expenses 367,900 127,400
Interest expense 11,700 4,940
Income tax expense 110,500 46,800
Current assets 434,600 195,436
Plant assets (net) 691,600 181,646
Current liabilities 86,223 43,831
Long-term liabilities 141,050 52,889
Net cash provided by operating activities 179,400 46,800
Capital expenditures 117,000 26,000
Dividends paid on common stock 46,800 19,500
Weighted-average number of shares outstanding 80,000 50,000

Required:
Compute the net income and earnings per share for each company for 2017.
b. Compute working capital and the current ratios for each company for 2017.
c. Compute the debt to assets ratio and the free cash flow for each company for 2017.

Greater concern for innovation and quality has shifted the job trend to using more broadly defined jobs. t/f

Employees at a library check out books to patrons. books have an isbn and a name. the library sometimes has multiple copies of the same book. books have one or more authors. a patron is an individual who has an active (non-expired) library card. for each library card, we store the person's first and last names and their address. for each employee, we store their employee id, current salary, first and last name and their address. we also store the employee id of their current manager. each time we check out a book to a patron we need to store the date of the transaction, the employee who checked out the book to the patron, and the library card of the patron. some employees have library cards. if an employee patron turns in a book late, the fine that they pay is a percentage of their salary. some employees are authors who have library cards—they are allowed to check out as many books as they like.

Cooper sues company a in state court in south carolina, where he lives, for negligence alleging personal injury and property damage of $100,000 after a truck driven by an employee of company a rear-ended his pickup truck. company a is incorporated in delaware, has its headquarters in new york, but does a substantial amount of business in south carolina. claiming diversity of citizenship, company a seeks removal to federal district court, but cooper opposes the motion. which of the following is true regarding whether the case may be properly removed to federal district court? the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and if company a's nerve center is in a state other than south carolina, then the case may be properly removed to federal court.the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and because company a is incorporated and has its headquarters in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is incorporated in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a's headquarters, nerve center, or principal place of business is located.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is headquartered in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a is incorporated and regardless of the location of its nerve center.because the amount in controversy fails to satisfy jurisdictional requirements, regardless of the location of company a, the case may not be removed to federal court.