X works with the company Y. After ten (10) years of working with the said company, he was dismissed. He files an illegal dismissed case. The Labor Arbiter required him to prove his allegation of illegal dismissed with substantial evidence. Failure to do so, the Labor Arbiter said he would dismiss the case. Is the Labor Arbiter correct? Why or why not?

Yes, he is correct

Explanation:

Considering law cases or any case that has to do with charging someone or an organization, it is always vital to have an evidence of proof to give or show to the law court when making your allegations against the company, failure to do so would mean you're not correct about what you're saying if though you might be right.

The Labor Arbiter is correct because the client has failed to give evidence to prove his/her allegation.

answer; (b) insider trading;

answer; it can vividly demonstrate product attributes and persuasively explain their corresponding consumer benefits;