Suppose that in 2023 one- and two-year interest rates are 5.7% in the United States and 1.2% in Japan. The spot exchange rate is 120.20/$. Suppose that one year later interest rates are 3% in both countries, while the value of the yen has appreciated to #114.87/$. a. Benjamin Pinkerton from New York invested in a U. S. two-year zero-coupon bond at the start of the period and sold it after one year. What was his return? (Do not round intermediate calculations. Enter your answer as a percent rounded to 2 decimal places.) Benjamin Pinkerton's return
b. Madame Butterfly from Osaka bought some dollars. She also invested in the two-year U. S. zero-coupon bond and sold it after one year. What was her return in yen? (Do not round intermediate calculations. Enter your answer as a percent rounded to 2 decimal places.) Butterfly's return in yen
c. Suppose that Ms. Butterfly had correctly forecasted the price at which she sold her bond and that she hedged her investment against currency risk. What would have been her return in yen? (Do not round intermediate calculations. Enter your answer as a percent rounded to 2 decimal places.) Butterfly's return in yen

Cooper sues company a in state court in south carolina, where he lives, for negligence alleging personal injury and property damage of $100,000 after a truck driven by an employee of company a rear-ended his pickup truck. company a is incorporated in delaware, has its headquarters in new york, but does a substantial amount of business in south carolina. claiming diversity of citizenship, company a seeks removal to federal district court, but cooper opposes the motion. which of the following is true regarding whether the case may be properly removed to federal district court? the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and if company a's nerve center is in a state other than south carolina, then the case may be properly removed to federal court.the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and because company a is incorporated and has its headquarters in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is incorporated in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a's headquarters, nerve center, or principal place of business is located.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is headquartered in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a is incorporated and regardless of the location of its nerve center.because the amount in controversy fails to satisfy jurisdictional requirements, regardless of the location of company a, the case may not be removed to federal court.