Business, 30.07.2020 05:01 ericahale3971

Which of the following was the result in Ackerman v. Sobol Family Partnership, LLP the case in the text involving whether the plaintiffs were bound by representations of their attorney regarding settlement that they had not approved? A- That the agreement entered into by plaintiffs' attorney would not be enforced because the plaintiffs had not signed it.
B- That the agreement would be enforced because the plaintiffs' attorney had apparent authority to enter into the agreement.
C- That the agreement entered into by plaintiffs' attorney would not be enforced because the plaintiffs had not given the attorney express authority to enter into the agreement.
D- That the agreement would be enforced because the plaintiffs' attorney had express authority to enter into the agreement.
E- That the agreement entered into by plaintiffs' attorney would not be enforced because the plaintiffs had not lead the opposing defense attorneys reasonably to believe that the plaintiffs' attorney had full and final authority to settle the litigation.

Answers: 3

Show answers

Another question on Business

Business, 21.06.2019 22:50

Assume that the governance committee states that all projects costing more than $70,000 must be reviewed and approved by the chief information officer and the it senior leadership team (slt). at this point, the cio has the responsibility to ensure that management processes observe the governance rules. for example, the project team might present the proposed project in an slt meeting for a vote of approval. what does this scenario illustrate about organizational structure?

Answers: 2

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 08:50

Dyed-denim corporation is seeking to lower the costs of value creation and achieve a low-cost position. as a result, it plans to move its manufacturing plant from the u.s. to thailand, which based on company research, is the optimal location for production. this strategic move will most likely allow the company to realize

Answers: 3

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 21:10

Which of the following statements is (are) true? i. free entry to a perfectly competitive industry results in the industry's firms earning zero economic profit in the long run, except for the most efficient producers, who may earn economic rent. ii. in a perfectly competitive market, long-run equilibrium is characterized by lmc < p < latc. iii. if a competitive industry is in long-run equilibrium, a decrease in demand causes firms to earn negative profit because the market price will fall below average total cost.

Answers: 3

Answer

Business, 22.06.2019 21:10

Which statement or statements are implied by equilibrium conditions of the loanable funds market? a firm borrowing in the loanable funds market invests those funds with a higher expected return than any firm that is not borrowing. investment projects which use borrowed funds are guaranteed to be profitable even after paying interest expenses. the quantity of savings is maximized, thus the quantity of investment is maximized. a loan is made at the minimum interest rate of all current borrowing.

Answers: 3

Answer

You know the right answer?

Which of the following was the result in Ackerman v. Sobol Family Partnership, LLP the case in the t...

Questions