Economists frequently assume that financial markets satisfy a "no-arbitrage" condition. If one investment is much more profitable than another, people will buy that profitable investment until its price rises (or return falls) and it is no longer super-profitable. Is this a realistic assumption? Why or why not?

Adistinguishing feature of ecological economics is the concept of cost-benefit analysis steady-state economies that, like natural systems, neither grow nor shrink environmental damage and also environmental benefits are external greenwashing to increase public acceptance of products the only healthy economy is one that is growing