f foreign investmentforeign investment fell by 100%, it would be cut in half. Thus, a decrease of 200% means that it would be totally eliminated, and a decrease of more than 200% is impossible. B. The actual amount of the decrease in foreign investmentforeign investment is less than 100%. C. The statement does not mention the initial amount of foreign investmentforeign investment.

if foreign investment fell by 100% it would be totally eliminated, so it not possible for it  to fall by more than 100%

Explanation:

Since in the question it is given that reduction of the western investment for the third world countries consist that foreign investment falls by 350% for the year 1990s

So if we go through the options, the wrong statement is the last one as it shows that the foreign investment fall by 100% i.e to be fully eliminated

Hence the other options are wrong

nice

explanation:

you two can make a great couple, goodluck caring for each other

none

explanation:

we're are the selections to pick from?