The preliminary 20 21 income statement of Alexion Systems, Inc., is presented below: ALEXIAN SYSTEMS, INC. Income Statement For the Year Ended December 31, 2021 ($ in millions, except earnings per share) Revenues and gains: Sales revenue 437 Interest revenue 5Other income 127Total revenues and pains Expenses: 569 Cost of goods sold 246Selling and administrative expense 151Income tax expense 43 Total expenses 440Net Income 129Earnings per share 12.90Additional Information: 1. Selling and administrative expense includes $27 million in restructuring costs. 2. Included in other income is $120 million in income from a discontinued operation. This consists of $90 million in operating income and a $30 million gain on disposal. The remaining $7 million is from the gain on sale of investments 3. Cost of goods sold was increased by $10 million to correct an error in the calculation of 2020's ending inventory. The amount is material Required: Prepare a revised income statement for 2021 reflecting the additional facts.

Use this image to answer the following question. when the economy is operating at point b, the us congress is most likely to follow

Abank has $132,000 in excess reserves and the required reserve ratio is 11 percent. this means the bank could have in checkable deposit liabilities and in (total) reserves.

Cooper sues company a in state court in south carolina, where he lives, for negligence alleging personal injury and property damage of $100,000 after a truck driven by an employee of company a rear-ended his pickup truck. company a is incorporated in delaware, has its headquarters in new york, but does a substantial amount of business in south carolina. claiming diversity of citizenship, company a seeks removal to federal district court, but cooper opposes the motion. which of the following is true regarding whether the case may be properly removed to federal district court? the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and if company a's nerve center is in a state other than south carolina, then the case may be properly removed to federal court.the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements; and because company a is incorporated and has its headquarters in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is incorporated in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a's headquarters, nerve center, or principal place of business is located.because the amount in controversy satisfies diversity requirements and company a is headquartered in a state other than south carolina, the case may be properly removed to federal court regardless of where company a is incorporated and regardless of the location of its nerve center.because the amount in controversy fails to satisfy jurisdictional requirements, regardless of the location of company a, the case may not be removed to federal court.