When a GEM Manufacturing experienced a slowdown in sales, it laid off the two employees with the poorest attendance. One of the employees sued the company, saying it should have laid off the most recently hired workers. What defense should GRM Manufacturing most likely offer

the layoffs were instances of employment at will

Explanation:

GEM Manufacturing's defense would most likely be that the layoffs were instances of employment at will.

Employment at will is a situation where a worker may be dismissed by an employer for any reason that may not be illegal and at anytime.

The Employers, in this question for example, terminated the relationship because of slowdown in sales. And this action affected the two employees with poorest attendance.

the correct answer is economics is a game without winners or losers.

unlike sports or games economic is a game without losers or winner rather it is a game where everyone wins. parties of business doing businesses exchange money with each other and hence exchange is done on the basis of goods. one party takes the goods and other sales it so there is winner on both sides. each party values more highly the good it gets than the good it gives up. both sides exchange only because both intend to increase their value. so there is no concept of lose or win.

if i need to borrow money for anything, it would be for something like a house or an apartment but, that depend on the situation.

is this good enough?