Ted is the owner and chief executive officer of a business. He recently began an advertising campaign to promote a new product that is regulated by state law. The law is somewhat unclear. Before launching the campaign, he researched the relevant law and consulted with his attorney in an effort to comply with the law. Nevertheless, the attorney general of his state has filed a lawsuit against him for deceptive advertising. Ted's best defense is that .a. He acted in good faith by conducting due diligence and acting accordingly, under anunclear law. b. Marshall owns and operates a construction firm. c. He uses inexpensive and low-gradebuilding products and accepts inferior carpentry work from his subcontractors. d. Nevertheless, Marshall complies with all the city building codes as well as all state and federal laws.

The answer is "Option a"

Explanation:

In the given question only "option a" is correct, which can be described as follows:

the specific actions take by the fed. what the fed was attempting to do by taking these actions. the result of the actions taken by the fed

being born in poverty would limit the people's chances, opportunities and benefits.

this happen because of several things, such as:

- poor people tend to gain less access to good education and nutrition. this mean that their chance to obtain high paying jobs would also be limited.

- poor people tend to socialize with other poor people while the rich tend to socialize with other rich people. this means that simply throguh their social circle, rich people would have more business opportunities compared to the poor people.

- rich people tend to have more capital in their disposal. this would benefit them in business since it is far easier for them to fund their business operation compared to poor people.