subject
Business, 05.05.2020 22:43 bowmanari2154

The management of Mitchell Labs decided to go private in 2002 by buying all 2.60 million of its outstanding shares at $23.50 per share. By 2006, management had restructured the company by selling off the petroleum research division for $11.50 million, the fiber technology division for $8.75 million, and the synthetic products division for $22 million. Because these divisions had been only marginally profitable, Mitchell Labs is a stronger company after the restructuring. Mitchell is now able to concentrate exclusively on contract research and will generate earnings per share of $1.60 this year. Investment bankers have contacted the firm and indicated that if it reentered the public market, the 2.60 million shares it purchased to go private could now be reissued to the public at a P/E ratio of 12 times earnings per share.
a. What was the initial cost to Mitchell Labs to go private?
b. What is the total value to the company from (1) the proceeds of the divisions that were sold, as well as (2) the current value of the 3.30 million shares (based on current earnings and an anticipated P/E of 12)?
c. What is the percentage return to the management of Mitchell Labs from the restructuring? Use answers from parts a and b to determine this value.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Business

question
Business, 22.06.2019 11:30
1.     regarding general guidelines for the preparation of successful soups, which of the following statements is true? a. thick soups made with starchy vegetables may thin during storage. b. soups should be seasoned throughout the cooking process. c. finish a cream soup well before serving it to moderate the flavor. d. consommés take quite a long time to cool. student c   incorrect
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 20:40
David consumes two things: gasoline (g) and bread (b). david's utility function is u(g, b) = 10g^0.25 b^0.75. use the lagrange technique to solve for david's optimal choices of gasoline and bread as a function of the price of gasoline, p_g, the price of bread, p_b, and his income m. with recent decrease in the price of gasoline (maybe due to external shock such as shale gas production) does david increase his consumption of gasoline? for david, how does partial differential g/partial differential p_g depend on his income m? that is, how does david's change in gasoline consumption due to an increase in the price of gasoline depend on his income level? to answer these questions, find the cross-partial derivative, |partial differential^2 g/partial differential m partial differential p_g.
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 20:50
The following accounts are from last year’s books at s manufacturing: raw materials bal 0 (b) 157,400 (a) 172,500 15,100 work in process bal 0 (f) 523,600 (b) 133,700 (c) 171,400 (e) 218,500 0 finished goods bal 0 (g) 477,000 (f) 523,600 46,600 manufacturing overhead (b) 23,700 (e) 218,500 (c) 27,700 (d) 159,400 7,700 cost of goods sold (g) 477,000 s manufacturing uses job-order costing and applies manufacturing overhead to jobs based on direct labor costs. what is the amount of cost of goods manufactured for the year
Answers: 3
question
Business, 23.06.2019 01:00
Why does the downward-sloping production possibilities curve imply that factors of production are scarce?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
The management of Mitchell Labs decided to go private in 2002 by buying all 2.60 million of its outs...
Questions
question
Biology, 04.10.2021 14:00
question
English, 04.10.2021 14:00
question
Mathematics, 04.10.2021 14:00
question
Mathematics, 04.10.2021 14:00
Questions on the website: 13722360